By Lee Wei Ling (LKY's daughter)
In 2007, in an end-of-year message to the staff of the National
Neuroscience Institute, I wrote: 'Whilst boom time in the public sector
is never as booming as in the private sector, let us not forget that
boom time is eventually followed by slump time. Slump time in the public
sector is always less painful compared to the private sector.'
Slump time has arrived with a bang.
While I worry about the poorer Singaporeans who will be hit hard,
perhaps this recession has come at an opportune time for many of us.
It will give us an incentive to reconsider our priorities in life.
Decades of the good life have made us soft. The wealthy especially, but
also the middle class in Singapore , have had it so good for so long,
what they once considered luxuries, they now think of as necessities.
A mobile phone, for instance, is now a statement about who you are,
not just a piece of equipment for communication. Hence many people buy
the latest model though their existing mobile phones are still in perfect
working order.
A Mercedes-Benz is no longer adequate as a status symbol.
For millionaires who wish to show the world they have taste, a Ferrari
or a Porsche is deemed more appropriate.
The same attitude influences the choice of attire and accessories. I
still find it hard to believe that there are people carrying handbags
that cost more than thrice the monthly income of a bus driver, and
many more times that of the foreign worker labouring in the hot sun,
risking his life to construct luxury condominiums he will never have a chance
to live in.
The media encourages and amplifies this ostentatious consumption.
Perhaps it is good to encourage people to spend more because this will
prevent the recession from getting worse. I am not an economist, but
wasn't that the root cause of the current crisis - Americans spending
more than they could afford to?
I am not a particularly spiritual person. I don't believe in the
supernatural beings and I don't think I have a soul that will survive my
death. But as I view the crass materialism around me, I am reminded
of what my mother once told me: 'Suffering and deprivation is good for
the soul.'
My family is not poor, but we have been brought up to be frugal.
My parents and I live in the same house that my paternal grandparents
and their children moved into after World War II in 1945. It is a big
house by today's standards, but it is simple - in fact, almost to the point
of being shabby.
Those who see it for the first time are astonished that Minister Mentor
Lee Kuan Yew's home is so humble. But it is a comfortable house, a
home we have got used to. Though it does look shabby compared to the
new mansions on our street, we are not bothered by the comparison.
Most of the world and much of Singapore will lament the economic
downturn. We have been told to tighten our belts. There will undoubtedly
be suffering, which we must try our best to ameliorate. But I personally
think the hard times will hold a timely lesson for many Singaporeans,
especially those born after 1970 who have never lived through difficult
times.
No matter how poor you are in Singapore , the authorities and social
groups do try to ensure you have shelter and food. Nobody starves in
Singapore . Many of those who are currently living in mansions and
enjoying a luxurious lifestyle will probably still be able to do so,
even if they might have to downgrade from wines costing $20,000 a
bottle to $10,000 a bottle. They would hardly notice the difference.
Being wealthy is not a sin. It cannot be in a capitalist market economy.
Enjoying the fruits of one's own labour is one's prerogative and I have
no right to chastise those who choose to live luxuriously. But if one is
blinded by materialism, there would be no end to wanting and hankering.
After the Ferrari, what next? An Aston Martin? After the Hermes Birkin
handbag, what can one upgrade to?
Neither an Aston Martin nor an Hermes Birkin can make us truly happy
or contented. They are like dust, a fog obscuring the true meaning of life,
and can be blown away in the twinkling of an eye.
When the end approaches and we look back on our lives, will we regret
the latest mobile phone or luxury car that we did not acquire? Or would
we prefer to die at peace with ourselves, knowing that we have lived
lives filled with love, friendship and goodwill, that we have helped
some of our fellow voyagers along the way and that we have tried our
best to leave this world a slightly better place than how we found it?
We know which is the correct choice - and it is within our power to make
that choice.
In this new year, burdened as it is with the problems of the year that
has just ended, let us again try to choose wisely.
To a considerable degree, our happiness is within our own control,
and we should not follow the herd blindly.
The writer is director of the National Neuroscience Institute.
2 Comments:
I think this is a very lopsided article.
Lee Wei Ling wrongly assumes that everyone who purchases expensive things is blinded by materialism.
What is wrong with purchasing a Ferrari? The Ferrari, after all, is a masterpiece of automotive engineering, a classic of car design, and a fantastic machine to drive. Indeed, it is a celebration of the pinnacle of human achievement in that field. What is wrong with someone appreciating this achievement and forking out a million dollars for one of those cars?
Absolutely nothing.
Indeed, neither an Aston Martin nor a Hermes Birkin can truly make us happy. But then neither can living in a shabby house nor self-denial make us happy either.
Wei Ling makes the fallacious implicit assumption that the appreciation of material goods must come at the expense at 'dying at peace' with oneself!
Finally - and i think this is a critical point - this article seems to imply that 'dying at peace' with oneself is the goal of life.
this is fundamentally WRONG within a Biblical context. I think the Bible makes it clear that the goal of humanity should be to die at peace with God, not oneself. the aim of our existence is to worship him and to draw close to him, to become Christlike.
Wei Ling's essay simply substitutes her version of self-fulfillment for materialism; and this is ultimately non-Christian
I have problems with Wei Ling's advocacy for organ trade and active euthanasia.
And the article is, as Kevin pointed out, fuzzy and confused.
Wei Ling's rhetoric is deep yet without substance. The same in this article as in her other articles on organ trade and euthanasia.
Post a Comment
<< Home